Do methodological trade-offs used to conduct rapid reviews of the literature lead to biased results and conclusions?

Systematic reviews are a type of research that collect and assess relevant information for a specific research question. However, they can take up to two years to complete. In situations with time constraints or limited resources, rapid reviews can provide decision-makers with evidence. Rapid reviews use modifications from systematic review processes, called trade-offs, resulting in less resources needed to reach a conclusion. However, they may lead to different studies being included in the review and different conclusions may be made. Our project focuses on investigating the impact of trade-offs on studies included and conclusions made in rapid reviews. The College of Chiropractors of British Columbia use rapid reviews to make policy decisions. As our partner in this proposal, this work will directly impact how they use research in their policy process, the practice of chiropractic, and the safety of patients and the public of the province.

Faculty Supervisor:

Pierre Cote

Student:

Partner:

College of Chiropractors of British Columbia

Discipline:

Life Sciences

Sector:

Public administration

University:

University of Ontario Institute of Technology

Program: